Association for Behavior Analysis International

The Association for Behavior Analysis International® (ABAI) is a nonprofit membership organization with the mission to contribute to the well-being of society by developing, enhancing, and supporting the growth and vitality of the science of behavior analysis through research, education, and practice.

Search

Fifth Annual Autism Conference; Washington, DC; 2011

Program by Continuing Education Events: Saturday, January 29, 2011


Manage My Personal Schedule

 

Invited Paper Session #10
CE Offered: PSY/BACB

Helping School-Age Students With Autism Succeed in the Regular Classroom

Saturday, January 29, 2011
8:15 AM–9:15 AM
Constitution Ballroom
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Behavior Analysis
Instruction Level: Intermediate
CE Instructor: William Heward, Ed.D.
Chair: William L. Heward (The Ohio State University)
WILLIAM L. HEWARD (The Ohio State University)
William L. Heward, Ed.D., BCBA, is Professor Emeritus in the College of Education and Human Ecology at The Ohio State University (OSU) where he helped train special education teachers for 30 years. Dr. Heward was as a Senior Fulbright Scholar in Portugal, a Visiting Scholar at the National Institute of Education in Singapore, a Visiting Professor of Psychology at Keio University in Tokyo and the University of S�o Paulo, Brazil, and given lectures and workshops in 14 other countries. His publications include more than 100 journal articles and book chapters and nine books, including Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education, 9th ed. (2009), and Applied Behavior Analysis, 2nd ed. (2007, co-authored with John Cooper and Tim Heron), which have been translated into several foreign languages. Awards recognizing Dr. Heward�s contributions to education and behavior analysis include the Fred S. Keller Behavioral Education Award from the American Psychological Association's Division 25, the Distinguished Psychology Department Alumnus Award from Western Michigan University, and the Ellen P. Reese Award for Communication of Behavioral Concepts from the Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies. A Fellow and Past President of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, Dr. Heward's research interests include "low-tech" methods for increasing the effectiveness of group instruction and adaptations of curriculum and instruction that promote the generalization and maintenance of newly learned knowledge and skills.
Abstract:

When asked why applied behavior analysis (ABA) is the most effective treatment for autism, Don Baer replied, "ABA is the discipline that has most consistently considered the problem of what behavior changes, made in what order and by what techniques, will confer the maximal benefit to the child." ABA's most scientifically documented outcomes of "maximal benefit" to children with autism have been achieved via early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) in home and clinic settings with children under age 6. While some children who have received EIBI make a smooth transition to public school classrooms, many others struggle mightily with the demands of a new and highly complex environment. ABA has yet to answer fully the question: What behavior changes produced by what techniques will accrue maximal success for students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in regular classrooms? A group of teachers, clinicians, researchers, and parents-all with extensive experience in ASD-were asked to identify the 3-4 most important (a) skills needed by students with ASD for success in general education classrooms, (b) instructional tactics teachers must know how to use to help students with ASD succeed in general education classrooms, and (c) things a behavior analyst should do or know to help teachers help students with ASD.

The group's responses revealed a remarkably similar set of behavior change targets (e.g., complete tasks without teacher prompts, interact appropriately with peers), instructional techniques for achieving those behavior changes (e.g., teach self-management, use collaborative learning activities), and suggestions for behavior analysts working in schools (e.g., simplify data collection, respect teachers' expertise and experience). This presentation will rely heavily on the collective wisdom and perspectives of this group of autism experts.

Target Audience:

Certified assistant behavior analysts and behavior analysts, behavioral consultants, behavioral therapists, clinicians, educational consultants, psychologists, special education teachers, supervisors of early intervention programs, and other individuals working with children with autism or other developmental delays

Learning Objectives:

 

  1. Identify six skill areas most frequently listed by a group of autism experts as most important for success in regular classrooms by students with autism.
  2. Define choral responding and response cards and how these techniques make group instruction more effective.
  3. Briefly describe how Numbered Heads Together and well-designed classwide peer tutoring systems (CWPT) counter the problems that make many collaborative learning activities ineffective.
  4. Identify three positive outcomes of teaching students how to recruit teacher attention and assistance.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #11
CE Offered: BACB

A Practitioner Model for Undergraduate and Graduate Training In Autism

Saturday, January 29, 2011
9:15 AM–10:15 AM
Constitution Ballroom
Area: AUT; Domain: Experimental Analysis
Instruction Level: Intermediate
CE Instructor: Richard Malott, Ph.D.
Chair: Richard W. Malott (Western Michigan University)
RICHARD W. MALOTT (Western Michigan University)
Dr. Richard Malott, Ph.D., BCBA-D (DickMalott@DickMalott.com) teaches behavior analysis at Western Michigan University (WMU), where he works with students interested in becoming practitioners, rather than researchers. He trains students to work with autistic children and to apply behavior systems analysis and organizational behavior management to human-services settings. He concentrates on training BA and MA students as well as Ph.D. students. Every summer, he runs the Behavioral Boot Camp, an intense 15-class-hour-per week, 7.5 week, graduate-level, behavior-analysis seminar for students from WMU and around the globe. Originally, he taught an intro behavior-analysis course to 1,000 students per semester, who produced 1,000 lever-pressing rats per year. Now, his students only condition 230 rats per year, but they also do 130 self-management projects and provide 13,500 hours of training to autistic children each year. To further those efforts, in 2008 he founded the Kalamazoo Autism Center. He also coauthored Principles of Behavior (the textbook previously known as Elementary Principles of Behavior.) Since 1980, he has been working on a textbook called I’ll Stop Procrastinating When I Get Around to It. He has presented in 14 countries and has received two Fulbright Senior Scholar Awards. In 2002, he also received ABA’s Award for Public Service in Behavior Analysis. And in 2010, he was elected president-elect of ABAI. For more information, please see http://DickMalott.com.
Abstract:

A practitioner/service-provider manifesto/creed: We must train more students to become basic researchers. We must train more students to become applied researchers. But our journals and books are already full of evidence-based best practices, yet we are without enough practitioners to significantly impact the well being of humanity by implementing those best practices. So even more importantly, we must produce more well-trained practitioners. Furthermore, our practitioner theses and dissertations (a) must really help the participating children, (b) must help the participating classroom or setting, (c) must help the student become a better practitioner, (d) must get the student a degree, (e) and a publication would be nice, but is not crucial. This presentation will illustrate an attempt to follow our manifesto/creed.

Target Audience:

Certified assistant behavior analysts and behavior analysts, behavioral consultants, behavioral therapists, clinicians, educational consultants, psychologists, special education teachers, supervisors of early intervention programs, and other individuals working with children with autism or other developmental delays

Learning Objectives:
  1. Describe the suggested problems with many programs designed to provide undergraduate and graduate training in autism.
  2. Describe the proposed solutions to training undergraduate and graduate students in autism.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #12
CE Offered: PSY/BACB

Visual Perceptual Aspects of Behaviorally-Based Augmentative Communication Systems

Saturday, January 29, 2011
10:30 AM–11:30 AM
Constitution Ballroom
Area: AUT; Domain: Experimental Analysis
Instruction Level: Intermediate
CE Instructor: Krista Wilkinson, Ed.D.
Chair: Krista M. Wilkinson (E. K. Shriver Center)
KRISTA M. WILKINSON (E. K. Shriver Center)
Krista Wilkinson received her Ph.D. in experimental psychology from Georgia State University, with an emphasis on normative and atypical language development. She currently holds a position as professor in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Wilkinson has also maintained a research affiliation with the behavioral technology research group at the E. K. Shriver Center (now part of the University of Massachusetts Medical School) since 1992, where she holds an appointment as adjunct associate scientist. Dr. Wilkinson has received uninterrupted funding from the National Institutes of Health since the mid-1990s. Her primary areas of study include processes of learning and communication in individuals with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. Much of her work has focused on the design and use of selection-based augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems. Most recently, she has studied visual processing and its relation to (and importance for) the design of optimal AAC system displays.
Abstract:

A child's potential is compromised when that child cannot express him or herself or does not understand what is being said. Frustration in communication often results in challenging behaviors. Intervention can offer conventional forms of communication and reduce problem behaviors. One form of intervention involves visual aids such as communication books or high technology devices from which the user selects symbols to produce messages; these are often called selection-based or aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). An interdisciplinary program of research that seeks to optimize the design of AAC systems will be discussed. This research integrates information from developmental psychology, visual cognitive science, and the experimental analysis of behavior to understand how individuals, particularly those with autism, process visual communication displays. Some unique demands of aided AAC will be highlighted and current research on visual functioning in autism will be reviewed. Specific ways in which cross-disciplinary collaboration between professionals in aided AAC intervention, autism spectrum disorders, and behavior analysis (groups that are not necessarily mutually exclusive of one another) could enrich both basic and applied sciences will be discussed. Behavior analytic approaches in particular excel at disentangling complex challenges of learning and attention through examination of the influences of stimuli in the environment on behavior. This approach may help optimize aided AAC displays because it can (a) enrich our understanding of the unique visual processing demands of selection-based AAC, and (b) contribute methodologies for studying the effects of these demands on behaviors related to aided AAC communication.

Target Audience:

Certified behavior analysts, behavioral consultants, behavioral therapists, clinicians, educational consultants, psychologists, special education teachers, and individuals working with children with autism or other developmental delays.

Learning Objectives:
  1. Discuss the reasons that visual processing is important to development of optimally effective selection-based communication displays.
  2. Identify the demands of selection-based AAC on visual attention and processing.    
  3. Analyze the ways in which these demands may interact with the visual processing skills and limitations of individuals on the autism spectrum. 
  4. Consider how emerging knowledge of AAC demands and display structure might influence construction of displays for clinical use.           
 
 
Invited Paper Session #14
CE Offered: PSY/BACB

Applying Behavioral Economic Concepts Towards the Treatment of Challenging Behavior in Individuals With Autism

Saturday, January 29, 2011
1:15 PM–2:15 PM
Constitution Ballroom
Area: AUT; Domain: Experimental Analysis
Instruction Level: Intermediate
CE Instructor: Iser DeLeon, Ph.D.
Chair: Iser Guillermo DeLeon (Kennedy Krieger Institute)
ISER GUILLERMO DELEON (Kennedy Krieger Institute)
Dr. Iser DeLeon received his Ph.D. in psychology from the University of Florida. He is currently an Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Director of Research Development for the Department of Behavioral Psychology at the Kennedy Krieger Institute. Dr. DeLeon has over 20 years of clinical and research experience, has co-authored over 60 research articles and chapters, and has received several recent federal grants on topics related to intellectual and developmental disabilities. Dr. DeLeon’s clinical and research experience has focused on the variables that give rise to severe behavior disorders (e.g., self-injury, aggression) in individuals with developmental disabilities, with an emphasis on the development of methods to assess the behavioral functions of these behaviors and the hypothesis-driven development of intervention. Separate, although often related, lines of research have examined choice responding in individuals with developmental disabilities, particularly as they are related to the implications of behavior economic concepts for the treatment of behavior problems.
Abstract:

Behavior analysts have increasingly applied economic concepts towards understanding issues of social significance in areas such as consumer choice, gambling, and substance abuse. This presentation will describe a translational progression of studies that applies economic concepts to work with individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities, culminating in demonstrations of the implications for the treatment of behavior problems. Initial laboratory investigations revealed that although two stimuli may appear equally valuable when their cost (in terms of response requirements) is low, under certain circumstances differences in value emerge when the response requirements increase. In subsequent clinical studies, this general theme was extended towards examining (a) the utility of various consequences when arranging interventions for behavior disorders, and (b) examining how the analyses required to identify these relations can be made practical and practicable in applied settings.

Target Audience:

Certified behavior analysts, behavioral consultants, behavioral economists, clinicians, educational consultants, psychologists, researchers, special education teachers, and individuals working with children with autism or behavioral disorders.

Learning Objectives:
  1. Explain what is depicted in a demand curve, both in terms of population consumption of a commodity and in relation to the consumption of reinforcers by individuals.
  2. Describe what is meant by demand elasticity and how the concurrent availability of substitutable reinforcers influences demand elasticity.
  3. Recognize at least one set of circumstances in which behavioral interventions for problem behavior may be more durable when they incorporate reinforcers that differ from those that maintain problem behavior.
  4. Utilize a brief assessment of demand elasticity to predict which sort of reinforcer will result in the more durable intervention for escape-maintained problem behavior.             
 
 
Invited Paper Session #15
CE Offered: PSY/BACB

Repetitive Behavior and Interests in Autism: Brain-Behavior Relationships

Saturday, January 29, 2011
2:15 PM–3:15 PM
Constitution Ballroom
Area: AUT; Domain: Experimental Analysis
Instruction Level: Intermediate
CE Instructor: James Bodfish, Ph.D.
Chair: James W. Bodfish (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
JAMES W. BODFISH (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Jim Bodfish, Ph.D. is the Thomas E. Castelloe Distinguished Professor of Psychiatry and Pediatrics at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC). He is Director of the Center for Development and Learning in the Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities at UNC. He received his degree in psychology with a concentration in developmental disabilities research from the University of Alabama and completed a post-doctoral fellowship in behavioral neurology at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center for Mental Retardation. As a clinician he has worked in home, preschool, school and hospital settings with infants, children and adults with a variety of developmental disabilities. This includes extensive experience in the assessment and treatment of autism and related conditions with a focus on the integration of behavioral and medical approaches for treatment-refractory cases. Dr. Bodfish�s research has focused on the pathogenesis and treatment of repetitive behaviors, behavioral disorders, and movement disorders and has been published in The New England Journal of Medicine, Science, the American Journal of Mental Retardation, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Autism, Autism Research, the Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, the Journal of Pediatrics, and the Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics.
Abstract:

Repetitive behavior and interests are a common clinical feature of autism. Specific patterns of behavior and interest give us insights into motivation in general. Functional or motivational theories are central to our understanding and treatment of many conditions; however, very little is known about motivational features in autism apart from general ideas of reduced social motivation and models of situational environmental correlates of aberrant behaviors. Research findings from the area of behavioral neuroscience of reward and addiction may help explain how repetitive behaviors and interests emerge, and how they can influence motivation, choice, learning and development in autism. Importantly, these basic research findings can be used to guide the development of novel forms of intervention in autism. In this talk, attendees will learn about (a) the clinical phenomenology of repetitive behavior and interests in autism, (b) brain-behavior research on interests and motivation in autism, and (c) how this research might be translated to everyday clinical practice.

Target Audience:

Certified behavior analysts, behavioral consultants, behavioral therapists, clinicians, educational consultants, psychologists, special education teachers, supervisors of early intervention programs, and other individuals working with children with autism or other developmental delays.

Learning Objectives:
  1. Describe the role that a variety of repetitive behaviors can play in the clinical presentation of autism.
  2. Identify findings from brain-behavior research on repetitive-behaviors, reward, and motivation.
  3. Explain how a model of brain-behavior relationships for repetitive behaviors can be used to guide the development of novel interventions for autism.
 
 
Invited Paper Session #16
CE Offered: PSY/BACB

Ethical, Professional, and Broader Contextual Issues Relating to Behavioral Intervention for Autism: Perspectives on the Evidence

Saturday, January 29, 2011
3:30 PM–4:30 PM
Constitution Ballroom
Area: AUT; Domain: Applied Behavior Analysis
Instruction Level: Intermediate
CE Instructor: Richard Hastings, Ph.D.
Chair: Richard P. Hastings (Bangor University)
RICHARD P. HASTINGS (Bangor University)
Richard Hastings completed his Ph.D. in 1994 in behavioral psychology working on the topic of challenging behavior in adults with intellectual disabilities. His focus was the extension of functional analysis to include an understanding of staff and other caregivers' responses to challenging behaviors. Since that time, he has continued to carry out research in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities. He now has over 120 peer review journal publications in the field, and has received in excess of $7 million external grant funding to support his work with colleagues. Dr. Hastings is an associate editor or on the editorial board for 15 international peer review research journals, and also acts as a consultant to several applied behavior analysis (ABA) organizations in the UK and to autism organizations internationally. With Dr. Bob Remington at Southampton University, Dr. Hastings co-directed the first and largest controlled evaluation of early intensive behavioral intervention for children with autism in the UK. Since that research, Dr. Hastings has published leading meta- and mega-analysis reviews of the evidence for comprehensive ABA intervention for children with autism, and has presented on this topic extensively in the UK, Europe, and North America.
Abstract:

Applied behavior analysis (ABA) methods have been built into comprehensive, intensive, and often early intervention for children with autism. Supporters of these intervention approaches often enthusiastically share the evidence base for these interventions with parents and policy makers. Although the evidence is impressive, it is important to understand the nature of the evidence base so that its limitations can be ethically and professionally communicated. The evidence from decades of single case experimental designs under-pins ABA intervention with children with autism, but such studies might best be considered a fine example of practice-based evidence and also do not directly support comprehensive and intensive long term intervention models. Group design studies provide the core of the evidence base for comprehensive ABA interventions for children with autism. However, the way that this evidence is used is too often at least implicitly driven by a medical model understanding of autism. In this presentation, I will examine the limitations of the evidence for comprehensive ABA interventions for children with autism and discuss an alternative outcomes model that does not get caught up with the recovery/cure debate. This model draws on the concept of reliable change first discussed in the general psychological therapy outcomes literature.

Target Audience:

Psychologists, behavior analysts, teachers, and other professionals working with children on the autism spectrum

Learning Objectives:
  1. Identify strengths and weaknesses of the evidence base for intensive behavioral intervention (IBI) for young children with autism
  2. Describe ethical and professional issues related to the communication of IBI evidence to the non-ABA community
  3. Describe the differences between a medically-informed perspective on outcomes of intervention for children with autism and an alternative “reliable change” perspective.
 

BACK TO THE TOP

 

Back to Top
ValidatorError
  
Modifed by Eddie Soh
DONATE
{"isActive":false}